AHC: Have 1st atomic bomb target struck be Truk (Chu'uk) lagoon IJN anchorage (as planned at one poi
Jul 25, 2023 1:30:19 GMT
stevep likes this
Post by raharris1973 on Jul 25, 2023 1:30:19 GMT
that's one of the points that inspired my comments but while Hailstone disabled it and forced its abandonment I suspect you would need the nuke to be available earlier for it to be a worthwhile target. Possibly if Pearl and or Midway had gone worse than OTL and the US CV force had been pretty much totally destroyed. That might delay the US advance via the central Pacific route even starting until the Essex class enter service in numbers and if the IJN in response to this build up have the bulk of their forces at Truk to counter this and the US doesn't yet have overwhelming carrier air strength to be confident of victory in a conventional attack then its a logical target.
Notice all the floating ships after ABLE? The USS Saratoga was 700 feet (200 meters) from the fireball. She was not even mission killed.
Does that tell you something about the limitations of an atomic bomb circa 1946? USS Nevada, the AIMPOINT, was scorched but not mission killed.
BAKER, the underwater burst would have better results from keel snaps and that big water hammer on close in ships, but again ships at some distance from the fireball were not mission killed.
The conclusion was that general concussion was not enough. You had to either use a very dirty bomb to poison the targets, or score direct hits on enemy capital units or overlap the bursts closely in time and space to assure proximity effects.
Four bombs instead of one. Probably double that number if you want to kill Chu'Uk as an anchorage. What works on a city, does not do so well against a fleet; even one at anchor... in 1946.
CYNICAL Miletus
I never promised it would be a successful or efficient mission, but it was one of the ones planned at some point.
So then even if the bomb and a delivery system is available extra early, or the conventional war's progress, on both ETO and PTO is very slowed down, the bomb might not be usable until conventional forces can seize the right tactical positions to give good bomber range to an enemy city (and mass fighter escorted bomber range if it is to a German city).
Mid-1940s atomic bombs were then sort of a deadly efficiently lethal weapon, but still fragile and of limited capability. Sort of like the saber-tooth tiger's saber-teeth. They would never take down prey with them - the saber-teeth could get damaged or broken and miss the vitals. Sabre-tooth tigers would still use their paws, claws, and weight to pin down their prey, just like any other big cat, but then use the saber-teeth for one big clean lethal bit to the carotid. So it would be with mid-40s atomic bombs.