No Washington Naval Treaty; An alternate Word War

[astronomo2029]

very good and interesting alternate ww2 , but please you are destroying aircraft Carriers to quickly , they are always escorted by Heavy cruisers , Destroyers , so it would not be easy to intercept British Carriers , but i see that the campaign against Japan is in full swing , soon they will regret to ever attack the USA , Cant hardly wait for the next update

[lordroel]

Jan 19, 2017 12:01:41 GMT astronomo2029 said:

very good and interesting alternate ww2 , but please you are destroying aircraft Carriers to quickly , they are always escorted by Heavy cruisers , Destroyers , so it would not be easy to intercept British Carriers , but i see that the campaign against Japan is in full swing , soon they will regret to ever attack the USA , Cant hardly wait for the next update

Thanks and for the update, try my best.

[dalecoz]

This is a fun scenario. I've kind of toyed with the "No Washington Naval Treaty" what-if, but this is a much more complete visualization. I do have some nits to pick, though most of them have already been picked, I see. I'm pretty sure the Soviets couldn't advance as quickly as this timeline proposes, even with a lot of foreign help. Historically they had trouble getting their surviving battleships into working order and heavy guns of the kind you would need for a battleship were well beyond their capability even into the late 1930s. And economically, none of the powers, with the possible exception of the US, could have kept up this pace. The US probably could have built this kind of fleet, but wouldn't have been politically willing to without Great Power rivals spurring them on.

All that being said, it is a cool scenario and it would be a lot of fun to game out some of the battles.

[lordroel]

Aug 3, 2017 5:33:52 GMT dalecoz said:

This is a fun scenario. I've kind of toyed with the "No Washington Naval Treaty" what-if, but this is a much more complete visualization. I do have some nits to pick, though most of them have already been picked, I see. I'm pretty sure the Soviets couldn't advance as quickly as this timeline proposes, even with a lot of foreign help. Historically they had trouble getting their surviving battleships into working order and heavy guns of the kind you would need for a battleship were well beyond their capability even into the late 1930s. And economically, none of the powers, with the possible exception of the US, could have kept up this pace. The US probably could have built this kind of fleet, but wouldn't have been politically willing to without Great Power rivals spurring them on.

All that being said, it is a cool scenario and it would be a lot of fun to game out some of the battles.

The timeline is based on this: Admiral Furashita's Fleet as are most of the schips.

[lordroel]

Battleships and battlecruisers of the United states Navy

Battleships

Florida-class battleship

USS Florida
USS Utah

Wyoming-class battleship

USS Wyoming
USS Arkansas

New York-class battleship

USS New York
USS Texas

Nevada-class battleship

USS Nevada
USS Oklahoma

Pennsylvania-class battleship

USS Pennsylvania
USS Arizona

New Mexico-class battleship

USS Mississippi
USS New Mexico
USS Idaho

Tennessee-class battleship

USS Tennessee
USS California

Colorado-class battleship

USS Colorado
USS Maryland
USS Washington
USS West Virginia

South Dakota class battleships

USS South Dakota
USS Indiana
USS Montana
USS North Carolina

North Carolina-class battleship

USS North Carolina
USS Oregon

Iowa-class battleships

USS Iowa
USS New Jersey
USS Wisconsin
USS Missouri
USS Illinois
USS Kentucky

Massachusetts-class battleships

USS Massachusetts
USS Ohio
USS Maine
USS New Hampshire
USS Louisiana

Battlecruisers

Lexington-class battlecruisers

USS Lexington
USS Constellation
USS Saratoga
USS Ranger